James Sherry

James SherryJames SherryJames Sherry

James Sherry

James SherryJames SherryJames Sherry
  • Home
  • About
    • Biography
    • C.V.
  • Publications
  • Talks
  • Interviews
    • Selfie (Darling)
    • Selfie (Fink)
    • Selfie (Kalb)
    • Selfie (Xu Xi)
    • The Oligarch (Tripp)
  • Reviews
    • Selfie (Rothenberg)
    • Selfie (Zammit)
    • Entangled Bank (Coleman)
  • Contact
  • More
    • Home
    • About
      • Biography
      • C.V.
    • Publications
    • Talks
    • Interviews
      • Selfie (Darling)
      • Selfie (Fink)
      • Selfie (Kalb)
      • Selfie (Xu Xi)
      • The Oligarch (Tripp)
    • Reviews
      • Selfie (Rothenberg)
      • Selfie (Zammit)
      • Entangled Bank (Coleman)
    • Contact

  • Home
  • About
    • Biography
    • C.V.
  • Publications
  • Talks
  • Interviews
    • Selfie (Darling)
    • Selfie (Fink)
    • Selfie (Kalb)
    • Selfie (Xu Xi)
    • The Oligarch (Tripp)
  • Reviews
    • Selfie (Rothenberg)
    • Selfie (Zammit)
    • Entangled Bank (Coleman)
  • Contact

SELFIE: review by Abigail Ardelle ZammiT

Poetry As Global Process

Review @ Poetry International

November 30, 2022


James Sherry’s newest critical study, SELFIE: Poetry, Social Change, & Ecological Connection, continues his immersive and insightful journey into the field of Environmental Poetics, and just as his earlier work, Oops! Environmental Poetics (BlazeVOX, 2013), is a fascinating read for poets and anyone who cares  about eco-poetics, eco-criticism, and the role of poetry within a world  assailed by the effects of global warming. SELFIE makes use of Sherry’s experience as a poet, critic, editor, publisher,  translator, citizen and human being, to reflect eclectically on  practical ways in which poetry changes ‘how we think about language,  ourselves, our societies, and our surroundings,’ and whether ultimately  this can slow global warming. Sherry invites us to consider, ‘How can  poetry, read by so few people, affect the monstrous scale of global  process?’ (14)   


This is not a book  about self-reckoning and chastisement following the ravishes of a  global pandemic—but one of rationalized hope, of practical faith in  alternative ways of being and becoming, based on evaluations of hard  fact and the inherent power of language. That is, not poetic language as  a class of its own wherein the poet is at once glorified and cast aside  as socially and ecologically irrelevant—but one where poetries truly  connect with social structures and environment ecosystems in fascinating  and powerful ways. Not all cultures and geographies are equally  responsible for climate change, not least because Sherry attributes the  alarming rise in temperatures to six main industrial polluters. Against  cynicism and discouragement, however, Selfie proposes that ‘[w]e are not helpless cogs but change the world as we  reorient our ways of using language as well as building our  surroundings.’ (279). He admits that the scale of the climatic cataclysm  is ‘big and difficult but not inconceivable’. (287) For this reason, it  would be much more viable for us to transform ourselves than to have to  change in unforeseeable ways.

This  isn’t a sit-back-in-the-passenger’s-seat read. Sherry’s fluid, erudite  mind draws freely from multiple fields of thought: language theory,  philosophy, social and environmental science, anthropology, technology,  culture theory, politics, poetry and publishing in order to query all  the connectives in the environmental model he proposes at the beginning  of the book. The work itself is composed of three main  sections—Multidirectional Writing, Perspectives on Combining,  Connections Below Form in Poetry and Biology. Each consists of six to  seven chapters where linear forms of reading give way to networks (NOT  webs) of thought, reflection, statement, proposition, multiple  exemplification, reiteration, re-contextualization, restatement.     

The  text fittingly plays itself in many styles—incorporating abstracts,  summary, argumentation, bullet points, diagrams, poetry from a wide  range of sources, note-form italicized text, as well as a world of  examples and clarifications, switching easily between the serious, the  playful – ‘singing a song of myselfie’ (69), and the poetic:


Adapt, the verb,

combines with a subject,

also with time: ‘adapt now!”

Subjects imply no rigid states

But inter-intra-action.
 

Readers coming to this text must  cast away the myths of binaries and individualism, as well as any  humanist, essentialist notions of self and other, in order to engage in  the concept of self as a multifold, interdependent, composite ecosystem  in a state of flux, and the selfie as image which connects this plural  self with whatever lies within it and outside it. 


You, Yous

You out there!

Youse and

Me, yes, me. Me

Are we and us

Or was. 

Twos.

And I am we, too,

A this and a that.

Those a they

And thus, an I, they

That is an I. (53-4)


Socialism  and idealized traditional relationships with the natural world are not  less inadequate as models of future behavior, than capitalist frameworks  which exploit natural resources. The proposed environmental model must  comprise self, society, surroundings and, most importantly, interior and  exterior connectors. 


Sherry’s  predilection is for language writing and for experimental and  avant-garde poetry because they tend to include ‘both personal  perspectives and the relations between individuals and society,’ unlike  eco-poetry and eco-poetics, which ‘are more directly and transparently  concerned with environment’ (19-20); for the former, the need to change  perspective is much more urgent and plausible than for the latter.  ‘Without extension into the other [disciplines], eco-poetry can be no  more than description with predictable effects on herds of cud chewers.’  (370) Which means that you might take issue with Sherry’s viewpoint  concerning what kind of poetry is ineffectual in changing the climate of  thought; for instance, when he takes conceptual and ekphrastic poetry  to task for drawing from one source and ‘inhibit[ing] change’ (172), or  when he argues that mere description of place fossilizes preconceived  notions and traditional schemas of thought. Perhaps one could argue that  any poem that is unable to move beyond the original  painting/sculpture/moment in time is problematic even without the index  of climatic pressure. Or again, there are instances where the author,  speaking of himself as editor, makes statements which can be problematic  if considered from a reader’s perspective: ‘I insist on a constraint  that even when writing is semantically difficult, the writer’s intention  must be comprehensible, or no one will read the poetry’ (176).


Yet,  given faith in readers’ ability to persevere with a poetic text even  when it is syntactically and semantically challenging, how does  experimental and language-centered writing change individual and group  biases? Pronouns, nouns, verbs, connectives, metaphors, synecdoche,  metonymy and syntax all play an important role. Environmental grammar,  for instance, emphasizes connectives like ‘and’, ‘so’ and ‘for’, instead  of ‘or’, ‘nor’, ‘but’, and ‘yet’. Environmental writing can set itself  the task of ‘writing with the biosphere’ instead of merely representing  it, thus ‘using its methods through multiple strategies that encourage individuals and groups to adjust behaviour and viewpoint’(76). In one of the most interesting chapters,  Sherry demonstrates how metaphor, which is both material and conceptual,  can act as a method ‘for scaling meaning across networks,’ influencing  the ‘climate of thought,’ exactly because as he amply demonstrates,  language and biosphere operate in similar ways (268): ‘Metaphors are  more than terminology and figures of speech. They are physical  correspondences that travel ecological networks carrying meaning and  ontology, connect A to B, love to bees, and so on’(288). In nature, too,  things often resemble each other, like wings on birds and bats, the  function of feet and flippers, or how a tree may signify food and  shelter to other species.  

One key question that Selfie asks is whether poets can go beyond ‘understanding poetry as only an  expression of self and society’(81). In Sherry’s view, self-expressive  language cannot contribute to the alleviation of global warming because  it encourages social fragmentation, which is why complex, problematic  structures and diction can perform better by deliberately making reading  more challenging so that writing would not merely be seen as a form of  communication. What he invites us to ponder is the effectiveness of  poetic methods that model ecological processes, including non-standard  syntax, non-linearity, non-standard vocabulary, format changes,  fragmented sentences, as well as the appropriation of science,  linguistics and philosophy.  


The  scope is to scale upwards to an environmental model where self and the  individual poem are perhaps less important than poetries as a whole—that  marvelous network of poets, readers, publishers, editors, distributors.  There is an urgent call for the dissemination of different kinds of  poetries at all levels: in print, online, via criticism, and in public  readings. The underlying principle is a community of infinite  connections where monologic, binary thought gives way to the plurality  that defines us, which is why I feel, on a personal level, that Sherry’s  book is also a call for a more altruistic form of creativity, one that  recognizes that to bring something into being, one has to consciously  connect with one’s society and surroundings—perhaps not merely with  poets with whom one shares an artistic affinity, but with the  borderlands which link to other poetic groups, where differences merge  and where we can muster enough agency to bring change through  collaborative practices.  


Finding  linguistic ways to adapt to the current climate crisis is on the one  hand, an acknowledgement of poetry’s unmistakable political role, and on  the other hand, an act of faith in its ability to influence readership  so as to bring about the mechanisms that will ultimately inspire crisis  mitigation and context-dependent solutions. Perhaps you’ll find fault  with Sherry’s probabilistic approach, or you might no longer have the  energy to conceive of climate change as a form of reversible damage, but  the author has painstakingly demonstrated how the connections that  govern our environment and our biosphere are in fact replicated in our  bodies and societies, which is why ‘changing how we think about  ourselves remains critical to slowing climate change’(196).  



© 2024 by James Sherry.  All rights reserved.          

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept